SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 6166

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RANJNA SHARMA AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
SITA RANI AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (290)

CR-366-2021 Date of Decision: - 20.11.2025 Ranjna Sharma and others ....Petitioners Versus Sita Rani and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Arun Kumar Singal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for respondent No.1.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 31.01.2020 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panchkula vide which the application under Section 151 CPC for recalling Sita Rani and her GPA Kulbhushan Sharma for the purpose of further cross-

examination has been dismissed.

2. It is not in dispute that respondent No.1-Sita Rani through her General Power of Attorney Kulbhushan Sharma had filed a suit for declaration with the following prayers: -

“Suit for declaration to the effect that the plaintiff has inherited 1/4th share in the estate (movable and immovable) left by late Sh. Sukhdev Sharma and accordingly the plaintiff is the owner of 1/4th share in the movable and immovable property left behind by late Sh. Sukhdev Sharma;

Suit f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top