IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 20.11.2025 MANROSE SINGH AND ANOTHER ......Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ *****

Present: - Mr. Jaswinder Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Savi Nagpal, Asst. A.G. Punjab.

*****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioners namely Manrose Singh and Sonia have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their lives and personal liberty from private respondents No.4 to 7.

2. The contention of the petitioners is that both are major, aged 25 years and 27 years respectively and they have performed marriage against the wishes of their parents. In support thereof, copy of the Aadhaar Cards pertaining to the petitioners have been appended. The marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 18.11.2025 at Prachin Pashupati Nath Shiv Mandir, M.D.C. Sector-6, Panchkula, as per Hindu rites and rituals. A copy of Marriage Certificate (Annexure P-5) issued by the aforesaid authority has also been appended. The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that a representation dated 18.11.2025 (Annexure P-7) has also been submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2-Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar and he confines his prayer that the representation may be examined.

4. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only.

5. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Ms. Savi Nagpal, Asst. A.G. Punjab has appeared and acceptes notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. She submits that she has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given.

6. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of without examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and expressing any opinion thereon, with a direction to respondent No.3- Station House Officer, Police Station Bhargo Camp, District Jalandhar to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation dated 18.11.2025 (Annexure P-7) and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances.

7. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners, nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law.

8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.3- Station House Officer, Police Station Bhargo Camp, District Jalandhar for requisite compliance.

(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ)

NOVEMBER 20, 2025 JUDGE Vishal Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No