Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J
Ameen – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks bail based on allegations related to treason. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the validity of the fir and implications. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. court emphasizes trial assessment of allegations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court opinion supports bail based on circumstances. (Para 9) |
| 5. petitioner granted bail with conditions. (Para 10) |
RAJESH BHARDWAJ , J. (Oral)
1. Present petition has been filed praying for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.184, dated 09.05.2025, under Sections 152 , 197-D of BNS , 2023, registered at Police Station Pinjore, District Panchkula.
2. Succinctly the facts of the case are that FIR in the present case was got registered on the statement of complainant, namely, Nitish Kumar. It was alleged that Ameen (petitioner), son of Aslam had raised the slogan ‘Pakistan Zindabad’ when the war was going on between India and Pakistan. It was alleged that being a citizen of this Country, Ameen (petitioner) had committed an act of treason against the Country and thus, the request was made to take legal action against the accused. On the basis of the allegations made, FIR was registered and the investigation com
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
