SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 7028

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RADHEY SHYAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


231 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:09.12.2025 Radhey Shyam ….Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana and Others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Bhupinder Malik, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Addl. A.G., Haryana Dr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate, Mr. Pankaj Attri, Advocate and Mr. Mahesh Inder Preet, Advocate for respondent No.4 ***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to award 3 marks for possessing Masters Degree in Computer Application.

2. The petitioner pursuant to advertisement dated 15.06.2021 applied for the post of Sub Inspector. As per advertisement, a candidate possessing Masters Degree in Computer Engineering/Science was entitled to three additional marks. The relevant extracts of the advertisement read as:-

“ Additional qualification:(10% weightage):- (10 Marks) (a) All candidates who have qualified the Physical Measurement Test shall be called for scrutiny of documents. All other candidates shall stand eliminated from further process of selection.

(b) i) For Sub-Inspecto

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top