211 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

Date of Decision: 12.12.2025 Narpat Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Tapan Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, DAG, Haryana.

****

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles

226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of:

(i) Order dated 05.12.2023 whereby he has been ordered to retire at the age of 55 years;

(ii) Enquiry report dated 09.12.2021 whereby he has been held guilty of the charges;

(iii) Order dated 22.12.2022 whereby punishment of stoppage of one future annual increment with permanent effect has been imposed upon him; and (iv) Order dated 07.08.2023 whereby his ACR for the period 2021-2022 has been downgraded.

2. The petitioner at the time of passing impugned order of retirement was holding post of Sub-Inspector. An FIR No.302 dated

03.07.2019 under Sections 148, 149, 324, 325, 326, 365, 307 & 506 of IPC and Sections 25, 54 & 59 of Arms Act, 1959 was registered at Police Station Dabua, District Faridabad against few persons including Rahisudee