IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUNIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:15.12.2025 Sunil Kumar ….Petitioner vs.
State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Bobby Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Addl. A.G., Haryana ***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of:
i Order dated 07.07.2008 (Annexure P-5) whereby punishment of stoppage of two increments was imposed upon him;
ii Order dated 06.11.2008 (Annexure P-17) whereby he was dismissed from service;
iii Order dated 30.01.2009 (Annexure P-18) whereby his appeal was dismissed by Inspector General, H.A.P., Madhuban;
and iv Order dated 27.12.2013 (Annexure P-19) whereby his appeal was dismissed by DGP, Haryana He is further seeking direction to respondent No. 2-DGP to decide his Mercy Appeal dated 10.02.2021 (Annexure P-20).
2. The petitioner was recruited as Constable in Haryana Police Force in March’ 2004. He was awarded punishment of stoppage of two future annual increments with permanent effect vide order dated 07.07.2008 on account of his absence f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.