IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J
United India Ins. Co. – Appellant
Versus
Nirmal Kaur and Ors. – Respondent
SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.
1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 01.05.2010 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amritsar (for short, 'the Tribunal’) in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , wherein, the appellant insurance company was held liable to pay the compensation to the claimants/respondents to the tune of Rs.12,13,000/-, on the ground of quantum of compensation to be on higher
side.
SUBMISSIONS OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES
2. Learned counsel for the appellant-Insurance Company vehemently argues that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is on the higher side. He further submits that the Tribunal has erroneously assessed the
income of the deceased as Rs.10,000/- per month without any cogent evidence to that effect. He further contends that the learned Tribunal has wrongly assessed the age of deceased as 42 years, however, the age of the deceased at the time of accident was 56 years. Accordingly, he prays that the present appeal be allowed and amount of compensation be reduced as per latest law.
3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent/claimant Nos.1 to 7 contend that learned Tribunal h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.