SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 7172

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURJIT KAUR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
INDERPAL SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent


SURJIT KAUR AND OTHERS VS INDERPAL SINGH AND OTHERS Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Chandanpreet Kaur, Advocate for the claimant.

Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Satpal Singh, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Paul S. Saini, Advocate for respondent-Insurance Company.

***

1. The present application has been filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC seeking review of the judgment dated 09.08.2024 on the ground that the cross-objections filed by the applicants were not adjudicated.

2. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 3/cross-objectors submits that respondent No.3 has been erroneously fastened with liability to pay compensation to the claimants. It is contended that while deciding Issue No.5, the learned Tribunal failed to consider material evidence on record, namely the verification report (Ex. R-1/1), copy of the driving licence (Ex. R-1/2), as well as the testimony of Inderpal Singh (RW-1). It is argued that Ex. R-1/2 is the driving licence of respondent No.1/cross-objector Inderpal Singh, which clearly formed part of the record. However, despite the existence of this documentary evidence, the learned Tribunal recorded a finding that the d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top