IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

216 (3 cases) CWP-4590-2009 Date of Decision: 12.12.2025 Romio Mokal …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents With Sr. Case No. Petitioner Respondents No.

2. CWP-9454-2024 Kavita Sharma State of Haryana and others

3. CWP-19765-2009 Sandeep State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate and Mr. Anuj Malik, Advocate for the petitioner (in CWP-4590-2009)

Mr. H.S. Dhindsa, Advocate for petitioner (in CWP-19765-2009)

Ms. Puneeta Sethi, Additional Advocate General, and Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Gurlabh S. Bhaika Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP-9454-2024 for respondent No.6 in CWP-4590-2009 for respondent No.11 in CWP-19765-2009 Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 7 in CWP-4590-2009 and respondent Nos.7 and 8 in CWP-19765-2009 ***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)

1. As common issues are involved in the captioned petitions, with the consent of all parties, the same are hereby disposed of by this common order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, facts are borrowed from CWP No.4590 of 2009.

2. The petitione