SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 7235

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GAJJAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BALAKI RAM – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-

RSA-1259-1993 (O&M) Reserved on:-03.12.2025 Pronounced on:- 12.12.2025 Uploaded on:- 15.12.2025 Whether only operative part of the judgment is Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment Gajjan Singh (since deceased) through LRs ....Appellant VERSUS Balaki Ram (since deceased) through LRs and Others ....Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate assisted by Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. G.S.Madaan, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 7.

Ms. Monika Jalota, Advocate for respondents No.9 to 12.

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU, J.

1. Present Regular Second Appeal has been filed by Gajjan Singh, appellant/defendant No.1, now represented through his legal representatives, challenging the judgment and decree of reversal passed by the learned Lower Appellate Court dated 05.05.1993, whereby the judgment and decree passed by the learned Trial Court dated 26.05.1990 were set aside.

Brief Facts

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that Balaki Ram and six other plaintiffs filed a suit for permanent injunction alleging that they were in peaceful, contin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top