SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 7239

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HANSA SINGH AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Hansa Singh and others ....Petitioners V/s State of Punjab and another ....Respondent Date of decision: 12.12.2025 Date of Uploading : 12.12.2025 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Arshpreet Khadial, Advocate for the petitioners.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

1. The petition in hand is a revision petition filed under Section 442 of BNSS laying challenge to order dated 01.10.2025 passed by Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Judge Special Court, Bathinda Vide the said order, the learned Additional Sessions Judge has dismissed the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. filed by the accused-petitioners for summoning/recalling five prosecution witnesses for further cross examination.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has iterated that the impugned order is contrary to both law and the material available on record and is well within the limitation period. Learned counsel has further iterated that the Court below has erroneously dismissed the application whereby the petitioners sought summoning/recalling of material prosecution witnesses i.e. PW-1 Sandeep Singh, Constable, Punjab Police, PW-5 Kewal Singh, PW-7 Dr. Deep Singh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top