IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

228-U Date of Decision:28.11.2025 PURAN SINGH AND OTHERS ......Petitioners Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. R.S. Manhas, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab.

****

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral)

[1]. By way of present writ petition, challenge has been laid to the order dated 07.09.2021 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate-cum-Land Acquisition Collector, RSD and Shahpurkandi Dam Project, Shahpurkandi Township, whereby the Reference preferred at the instance of the petitioners/landowners having invoked Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the 1894 Act’)

was dismissed.

[2]. Briefly stating, in the present case, some land owned by the petitioners/landowners situated within the revenue estate of village Kot Tikka Majra, Tehsil Dhar Kalan, Distt. Gurdaspur, came to be acquired vide Notifications dated 16.06.1994 and 28.10.1994 issued under Sections 4 & 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 respectively for the public purpose namely for construction of Shahpurkandi Dam Project. The Award under Section 11 of the 1894 Act was passed by the