IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RESHAMJIT SINGH CHINNA – Appellant
Versus
KULDIP SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (116)
Date of Decision:-28.11.2025 Reshamjit Singh Chinna ……Petitioner Versus Kuldip Singh and Others ……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****
Present: Mr. K.B.S. Mann, Advocate for the petitioner.
****
AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking setting aside of the impugned order dated 14.10.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Amritsar, whereby the defence of the petitioner was struck off due to non filing of written statement.
2. Briefly, the facts are that the respondent-plaintiff instituted a suit against the petitioner. On 29.07.2025, the petitioner/defendant appeared before the learned Trial Court for the first time. Vide order dated 14.10.2025, the learned Trial Court struck off the defence of the petitioner on the ground of non-filing of the written statement.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not afforded adequate and reasonable opportunity to file the written statement. It is contended that striking off the petitioner’s defence at this stage would cause grave prejudice to his rights and adversely affect the fair and proper adjudication of the case. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that one final opportunity be granted to the petitioner to file the written statement.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the paper book.
5. In view of the nature of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondents is dispensed with, as it would only delay the proceedings and cause unnecessary expenditure to the respondent. 6. Having considered the submissions and upon perusal of the record, this Court is of the view that the learned Trial Court adopted an unduly strict approach in striking off the defence of the petitioner and this Court feels that the ends of justice would be met by granting the petitioner one effective opportunity to file his written statement. Considering further that valuable rights of the petitioner are involved in the matter, denial of such opportunity would result in grave prejudice to him.
7. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 14.10.2025, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Amritsar, is hereby set aside, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 10,000/-, to be deposited by the petitioner in the District Legal Services Authority, Amritsar.
8. The petitioner shall appear before the learned trial Court on the date fixed and on his production of receipt qua deposition of costs, the trial Court shall grant one effective opportunity to the petitioner for filing of written statement.
9. The Registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Amritsar, for compliance.
10. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly.
(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL)
JUDGE
28.11.2025 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.