SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DAYAPAL AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-22-2026

DECIDED ON: 02.01.2026

DAYAPAL AND ANOTHER

.....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

.....RESPONDENT(S)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL

Present: Mr. Sitanshu Sharma, Advocate

for the petitioner(s)

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)

1. Prayer

The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under section 528 of

BNS-2023, for setting aside the impugned order dated 24.12.2025 (Annexure P-1) vide which the application for grant of anticipatory bail, in case FIR No. 205 dated 24.11.2025 (Annexure P-2) registered against the accused including the petitioners in Police Station Chhainsa district Faridabad u/s 115, 190, 191(2), 351(2) of the BNS-2023 and section 3(1)(x) of Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 was added later on, was dismissed and the same is bad in law, perverse and thus the same is liable to be set aside and the

petitioners may be granted anticipatory bail.

2 Contention On behalf of the petitioner Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and that there is a delay of 10 days in lodging the FIR, for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top