IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DAYAPAL AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-22-2026
DECIDED ON: 02.01.2026
DAYAPAL AND ANOTHER
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
.....RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Present: Mr. Sitanshu Sharma, Advocate
for the petitioner(s)
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)
1. Prayer
The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under section 528 of
BNS-2023, for setting aside the impugned order dated 24.12.2025 (Annexure P-1) vide which the application for grant of anticipatory bail, in case FIR No. 205 dated 24.11.2025 (Annexure P-2) registered against the accused including the petitioners in Police Station Chhainsa district Faridabad u/s 115, 190, 191(2), 351(2) of the BNS-2023 and section 3(1)(x) of Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 was added later on, was dismissed and the same is bad in law, perverse and thus the same is liable to be set aside and the
petitioners may be granted anticipatory bail.
2 Contention On behalf of the petitioner Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and that there is a delay of 10 days in lodging the FIR, for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.