IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJ KUMAR @ RAJU NAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-74129-2025
DECIDED ON: 01.01.2026
RAJ KUMAR @ RAJU NAI
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB .....RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Present: Mr. Raghav Soni, Advocate
for the petitioner(s) through Hybrid Mode
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)
1. Prayer
The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 482
BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 38 dated 01.04.2018 under Sections 307, 323, 148, 149 of IPC, 1860 registered at Police
Station Ajnala, District Amritsar Rural (Annexure P-1).
2 Contention
On behalf of the petitioner
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been
falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he was present at the spot as no specific role is assigned to him and no injury is alleged to have been caused by him. The attention of this Court has been drawn to an order dated 23.07.2025 (Annexure P-2) passed
in CRM-M-39084-2025 vide which co-accused Harpal Singh @ Bhalu has already been granted the concession of anticipatory bail by this Court. Learned counsel undertake
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.