SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AIJAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-74151-2025

DECIDED ON: 01.01.2026

AIJAJ

.....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA

.....RESPONDENT(S)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL

Present: Mr. Imtiyaz Hussain, Advocate

for the petitioner(s)

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)

1. Prayer

The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked Section 482 BNSS

2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.01 dated 01.09.2022 (Annexure P-1), under sections 419,420,467,468,471,383 & 34 IPC 1860, P.S.

Cyber Crime, Sirsa, District Sirsa, (Annexure P-1).

2 Contention

On behalf of the petitioner

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been

falsely implicated in the present case solely on the basis of a disclosure statement made by co-accused. He further submits that the co-accused persons have already been granted the concession of bail either by this Court or by the Trial Court vide different orders annexed as Annexures P-4 to P-7. Learned counsel undertakes, on

behalf of the petitioner, that the petitioner is ready and willing to join the investigation.

Notice of motion.

On behalf of the State/complainant On the asking of Court, Mr. Rahul Dev Singh, Addl. AG

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top