SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 7323

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMRIT LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent



115 ( 20 cases)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

1. CWP-28696-2025

MAHABIR SINGH .....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

2 CWP-32210-2024

CHINTI DEVI

.....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

3. CWP-26971-2025

REETU AND ORS. .....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

.....RESPONDENT(S)

4. CWP-27480-2022

ISHWAR SINGH

.....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

5. CWP-21730-2017

RAJINDER PRASHAD

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

6. CWP-21808-2025 ABHEY RAM SHARMA VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

7. CWP-11975-2025 GURMAIL SINGH .....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

8. CWP-23314-2025 AMITA RANI @ AMITA .....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

9. CWP-23170-2017 BRIJ BHUSHAN .....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

10. CWP-23525-2024 BANSO RANI .....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

11. CWP-14085-2018 JUGBIR SINGH @ JAGBIR SINGH VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

12. CWP-14152-2018 HANSRAJ VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

13. CWP-15225-2024 JOGINDER PAL .....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

14. CWP-31558-2024 HARJIT SINGH AND ANR.

.....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

15. CWP-30915-2025 MANGU AND ANR. .....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

16. CWP-11399-2021 AMRIT LAL .....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

17. CWP-15388-2022 RAJ KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

18. CWP-16245-2021 MANU RAM (DECEASED) THROUGH LRs VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

19. CWP-16311-2024 MADAN LAL .....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

20. CWP-29090-2024 JAGDISH PARSHAD .....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kartikey Chaudhary, Advocate Mr. Ravinder Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aman Nain, Advocate and Mr. Rishab Arora, Advocate Mr. Karan Bhardwaj, Advocate Mr. D.P.S. Bajwa, Advocate Mr. Ramesh Goyat, Advocate Mr. S.P. Arora, Advocate Mr. Sandeep Thakur, Advocate Mr. Ishaan, Advocate Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate Mr. Ankur Goyat, Advocate Mr. Jasmeet Singh Bedi, Advocate and Mr. Rahul Jain, Advocate Mr. Raman B. Garg, Advocate with Mr. Mayank Garg, Advocate with Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate Mr. Nihal S. Choudhary, Advocate with Ms. Anita S. Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Dharamveer Phour, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Nagpal, Advocate Mr. Ravinder Rana, Advocate Mr. Suvir Sidher, Advocate with Mr. Harlove Rajput, Advocate and Mr. Manjot Bhullar, Advocate Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate and Mr. Dharampal Saini, Advocate, Mr. Gurinder Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s)

Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. AG. Haryana Mr. R.D. Sharma, DAG, Haryana.

Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Jagdeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. Rajnikant Upadhyay, Advocate for respondent(s).

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.

Vide the present common order, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of all the above-mentioned writ petitions together, as they involve identical questions of law and similar factual matrix.

The present bunch of petitions, being squarely covered, are hereby allowed in terms of the judgment dated 23.12.2025 passed by this Court in CWP-26643- 2025 and other connected cases titledManoj Kumar v. State of Haryana and another’.

Accordingly, in view of the settled position and for the sake of consistency, the present writ petitions are allowed in the same terms and with the same directions as issued by this Court in CWP-26643-2025 and other connected cases decided on 23.12.2025.

All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

A photocopy of this order be placed on the file(s) of the other connected case(s).

(SANDEEP MOUDGIL)

31.12.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top