SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 7341

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANIK KHURANA – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

102 CWP-39633-2025

Date of decision: 29.12.2025

Manik Khurana .....Petitioner

Versus

The Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh

and others

.....Respondents

107 CWP-39669-2025

Date of decision: 29.12.2025

Sagar and another .....Petitioners

Versus

Union Public Service Commission and others .....Respondents 108 CWP-39672-2025

Date of decision: 29.12.2025

Jai Ishwar and others .....Petitioners

Versus

The Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh

and others

.....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL

Present : Ms. Geetanjali Chhabra, Advocate

for the petitioner in CWP-39633-2025.

Mr. Kulwinder Bhargav, Advocate

for the petitioner(s) in CWP-39669-2025.

Mr. Akshat Dalal, Advocate

for the petitioner(s) in CWP-39672-2025.

Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate (through VC)

for respondent No.2-UPSC in CWP-39633-2025,

for respondent No.1-UPSC in CWP-39669-2025 and

for respondent No.3-UPSC in CWP-39672-2025.

Ms. Shubreet Kaur, Advocate with Ms. Sukriti Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4-U.T., Chandigarh in CWP-39633-2025.

Ms. Madhu Dayal, Additional Standing Counsel with Mr. Varun Sandh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top