IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
YUVRAJ GAMBHIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRM-M No.71670 of 2025 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
232
*****
CRM-M No.71670 of 2025
Date of decision : 24.12.2025
Date of uploading : 24.12.2025
Yuvraj Gambhir ………….Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab …….Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL
Present: Mr. Vioshal Sharma (Vasudeva), Advocate, for the petitioner
Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Addl. AG, Punjab
---
SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL)
1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of
regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.01 dated 1.1.2023 under
Section 22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985,
registered at Police Station Garhshankar, District Hoshiarpur.
2. The gravamen of the FIR in question is that the petitioner was
apprehended by the police and 110 grams of intoxicant powder having
salt alprazolam allegedly was recovered from the petitioner on 1.1.2023
while he was walking on the kacha rasta along with the canal near Canal
Bridge, Nawanshahar Road, Garhshankar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner
is in custody since 1.1.2023. Learned counsel has further argued that the
1 of 8
::: Downloaded on - 06-01-2026 10:17:08 :::
##PAGE2##CRM-M No.71670 of 2025 -2-
petitioner has been falsely implicated into the FIR in question. Learned
counsel has further submitted that mandatory provision of NDPS Act has
not been complied with and therefore, the prosecution case suffers from
defects. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner was
earlier extended the concession of interim regular bail on 1.2.2023 on
account of non-filing of FSL report, whereinafter FSL report was
presented on 3.9.2024 and the petitioner has surrendered back. In this
way, the petitioner is now in custody since 3.9.2024. Learned counsel has
further submitted that the contraband allegedly recovered is 110 grams of
alprazolam, which is marginally above from the threshold quantity of 100
grams. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner is in
custody since more than 9 months. Thus, regular bail is prayed for.
4. Learned State counsel has opposed the present petition by
arguing that the allegations raised are serious in nature and thus the
petitioner does not deserve the concession of the regular bail. Learned
State counsel has further iterated that the petitioner is accused of offence
pertaining to commercial quantity under the NDPS Act, and thus, his bail
petition is barred in view of the Section 37 of the Act. Learned State
counsel seeks to place on record custody certificate dated 22.12.2025 in
Court, which is taken on record.
5. I have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the
available records of the case.
6. The petitioner was arrested on 1.1.2023 whereinafter he was
granted the concession of interim regular bail. After presentation of FSL
2 of 8
::: Downloaded on - 06-01-2026 10:17:09 :::
##PAGE3##CRM-M No.71670 of 2025 -3-
report, he has surrendered back and is in custody since 3.9.2024. Challan
in the case was presented on 3.9.2024. Total 9 prosecution witnesses
have been cited out of which 3 have been examined. It is thus,
indubitable that conclusion of the trial will take long. It is not in dispute
that the contraband allegedly recovered from the petitioner is 110 grams
of alprazolam, which is marginally above the threshold limit of non-
commercial quantity. Reliance in this regard can be placed upon the
orders passed by this Court in Rajdev Giri versus State of Punjab, CRM-
M-44898-2019, decided on 18.09.2020; Rahish versus State of Haryana,
CRM-M-36498-2020, decided on 11.11.2020; Karambir versus State of
Haryana, CRM-M-31820-2019, decided on 28.08.2019: Jagjit Singh @
Jagga Gill versus State of Punjab, CRM-M-41242-2019, decided on
27.02.2020 and Baljit Kaur @ Baljito versus State of Punjab, CRM-M-
12849-2020, decided on 04.06.2020, wherein accused were enlarged on
bail in cases where the alleged recovery was slightly more than the
quantity prescribe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.