IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SATNAM SINGH ALIAS SAJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRM-M-71763-2025 - 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
204
CRM-M-71763-2025
Decided on : 24.12.2025
Satnam Singh @ Sajan . . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab . . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
PRESENT: Ms. Komalpreet Kaur, Advocate
for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Jasdeep Singh, Addl. AG, Punjab.
****
SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)
1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS,
2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner,
during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising
out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under:-
Name ofFIR Date Section(s) Police Station District
Petitioner(s) No.
Satnam Singh @57 09.05.2025 21(b), 27(a), 29/61/85 of NDPS City Amritsar
Sajan Act, 1985 Sultanwind
2. As per allegations levelled in FIR, 9.18 grams of heroin was
recovered from a polythene envelope, which the petitioner was holding in his
hand and he was in the process of throwing it away on seeing the police party.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that there is no other
instance ever registered against the petitioner under the NDPS Act in past.
Moreover, quantity recovered is marginal more than the small quantity, i.e., 5
grams.
Further argues that after completion of investigation, final report
(challan) has already been submitted, however, process of recording of
statements of the prosecution witnesses, is yet to start. Thus, conclusion of trial
shall take considerable time. Besides, petitioner is inside jail for a period of
about 07 months and 11 days and thus, cannot be detained inside jail for
indefinite period in the absence of any progress in the trial, it is prayed that the
1 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 06-01-2026 10:21:43 :::
##PAGE2##CRM-M-71763-2025 - 2 -
petitioner also deserves to be extended the same benefit of regular bail.
4. On the other hand, learned State counsel has filed the custody
certificate dated 23.12.2025, in Court today, which is taken on record. Office
to tag the same at appropriate place.
A copy thereof has been handed over to the counsel for the
petitioner.
5. Learned State counsel while opposing the prayer for bail, submits
that quantity recovered is almost double to the small quantity of heroin, as it is
near to 10.00 grams. He also submits that such kind of offences are at rise in
the State of Punjab and granting bail to the petitioner will send a wrong
message to the youth of the State.
However, learned State counsel does not dispute the fact that trial
is yet to start, though investigation has been completed. Besides, other factual
assertions as noticed here-above have not been disputed by learned State
counsel.
6. On being asked by the Court, learned State counsel also confirmed
that petitioner was never found indulge in any other similar activity ever in
past.
7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of
the material on record, it is evident that recovery effected from the petitioner is
marginal higher than the small quantity, i.e., 9.18 grams of heroin in the present
case. Further, petitioner, who is aged about 30 years, has already undergone
incarceration for more than seven months. The investigation stands concluded,
and the trial is likely to take considerable time to reach its culmination.
Considering his young age and other antecedents, this Court is inclined to
extend him an opportunity to reform and rehabilitate himself in society rather
than keeping him confined behind bars for an indefinite period during the trial.
In view of the totality of these circumstances, and the nature
allegations leveled against the petitioner, including the factors noticed here-
above, this Court deems it appropriate to grant the concession of bail to the
petitioner, so as to afford the petitioner an opportunity to reform and reintegrate
himself in the society.
Consequently, prayer made in the present petition is allowed.
Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to his furnishing bail/surety
2 of 3
:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.