SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8375

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURDEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent



##PAGE1##

(cid:1) CRM-M-71872-2025 (O&M) 1

(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)

(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

215

CRM-M-71872-2025 (O&M)

Date of decision: 24.12.2025

Gurdeep

....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY

*****

Present : Mr. Rajesh Nain, Advocate for the petitioner

(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:4)(cid:6)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:3)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:7)(cid:10)(cid:1)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:1)(cid:14)(cid:7)(cid:3)(cid:15)(cid:7)(cid:16)(cid:7)

*****

AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS is for

grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.666 dated 08.08.2023,

registered under Sections 302, 120-B, 147, 148, 149 IPC, at Police Station

Barwala, District Hisar.

2. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody

for 2 years and more than 4 months. He alleges false implication. He has neither

named in the FIR nor been assigned any specific role or in the deposition of the

material witnesses. All other co-accused have since been granted regular bail by

this Court, after being in custody for the period between 11 months to 2 years.

Charges have been framed on 03.04.2025 and out of 22 PWs, 4 material

witnesses have been examined. The petitioner is involved in 1 more

case, wherein he is on bail. Reliance is placed on the judgment passed by

1 of 4

::: Downloaded on - 06-01-2026 10:23:31 :::

##PAGE2##

(cid:1) CRM-M-71872-2025 (O&M) 2

(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)

(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)

Hon'ble The Supreme Court titled as Maulana Mohd. Amir Rashadi vs. State

of U.P. and others, 2012(2) SCC 382

3. The custody certificate dated 23.12.2025, filed by the learned State

counsel is taken on record. As per the same, the petitioner is behind bars for 2

years, 4 months and 4 days.

4. Learned State counsel opposes the bail on the ground that there are

specific allegations against the petitioner of having given kasola blow on the

head and shoulder of the deceased-Rajesh. However, he is unable to controvert

the submissions with regard to stage, petitioner being on bail in another case

and co-accused having been enlarged on bail.

5. Heard.

6. Hon'ble The Supreme Court in the case of Maulana Mohd. Amir

Rashadi (Supra)had held that, “As observed by the High Court, merely on the

basis of criminal antecedents, the claim of the second respondent cannot be

rejected. In other words, it is the duty of the Court to find out the role of the

accused in the case in which he has been charged and other circumstances such

as possibility of fleeing away from the jurisdiction of the Court, etc.”

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in particular

that the petitioner is in custody for 2 years, 4 months and 4 days; on bail in

another case; co-accused are on bail; Charges were framed on 03.04.2025,

however, 18 more prosecution witnesses still remain to be examined, the trial is

likely to take a considerable time, further incarceration of the petitioner would

be violative of his right enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India,

the present petition is allowed.

2 of 4

::: Downloaded on - 06-01-2026 10:23:32 :::

##PAGE3##

(cid:1) CRM-M-71872-2025 (O&M) 3

(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)

(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:1)(

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top