IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

DATE OF DECISION :- 24.12.2025

Karan Singh and others ...Petitioners

Versus

Ravi Kumar and others ...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present:- Ms. Pallavi Babbar, Advocate for the petitioners.

***

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 07.11.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kaithal, as well as the order dated 04.12.2025 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Kaithal, whereby the appeal

against the order dated 07.11.2025 was dismissed.

2. Briefly stated, the petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction claiming that he is a co-owner in possession of 8/39 share of the suit property, while defendants No. 2 and 3 claim to be co-owners in possession of 20/39 share of the suit property. Defendants No. 2 and 3 leased out their share of the property in favour of defendant No. 1 through a registered lease deed dated 07.03.2024. The suit property has not yet been

partitioned. According to the petitioner, defendants No. 2 and 3 have no right to lease out any specific or valu