114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Date of Decision:22.12.2025

MIYAN SINGH ...Petitioner

Vs.

SATPAL AND ANOTHER ...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present: Ms. Renu Dhull, Advocate

for the petitioner (Through VC).

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. ( Oral)

1. The present revision petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 14.11.2025 (Annexure P-6) vide which learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaithal, has closed the evidence of

the petitioner.

2. The impugned order has been assailed on the ground that petitioner had moved an application dated 17.12.2024 for depositing the diet money of the said witnesses, and pursuant thereto, the diet money was duly deposited on 03.01.2025. At the relevant time, the suit was pending at the stage of petitioner/plaintiff’s evidence and was fixed for recording evidence on 28.03.2025. Learned Civil Judge, vide the impugned order, abruptly closed the petitioner’s evidence. The evidence was closed without issuing summons to the witnesses for whom the diet money had already been deposited and without affording the petit