IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANITA DEVI AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
LAL CHAND @ LALLI AND OTHER – Respondent
##PAGE1##
FAO-3207-2019 --1--
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARAYNA
AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-3207-2019
Reserved on: 15.12.2025
Pronounced on: 24.12.2025
Uploaded on: 24.12.2025
ANITA DEVI AND ANOTHER …..Appellants
Vs.
LAL CHAND @ LALLI AND OTHERS …..Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Manglesh Kumar, Advocate for
Mr. Shakti Mehta, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Maninder Arora, Advocate with
Mr. Harmeet Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 3.
*****
HARKESH MANUJA, J.
1. By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to an award dated
13.02.2019 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh
(for brevity, “the Tribunal”), whereby an amount of Rs. 7,89,000/- was awarded as
compensation to the appellants/claimants along with interest @ 7.5% per annum
from the date of institution of claim petition till its realization on account of death
of Ashish Kumar in a motor vehicular accident, occurred on 25.03.2017.
2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to
quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, as such, detailed
narration of the facts of the case is not reproduced for the sake of brevity.
ARGUMENTS
ON BEHALF OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS
1 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 06-01-2026 11:53:54 :::
##PAGE2##FAO-3207-2019 --2--
3. The learned counsel for the appellants assailed the award by submitting
that the learned Tribunal misdirected itself while assessing the income of the
deceased by arbitrarily fixing it at Rs. 5,000/- per month, despite uncontroverted
statements of the appellants/claimants stating that the deceased was engaged in the
repair of scooters and motorcycles and earning Rs. 15,000/- per month. He further
submitted that the learned Tribunal erred in not awarding any amount under the
head of filial consortium, though as per the settled law laid down by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court, the appellants were entitled to compensation of Rs. 40,000/- under
the said head. Furthermore, it was submitted that the rate of interest awarded by the
learned Tribunal @ 7.5% per annum was on the lower side, therefore, he prayed
for enhancement of compensation as per latest decisions on the subject.
ON BEHALF OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT
No.3/INSURANCE COMPANY.
4. Per contra, learned counsel representing No.2/ Insurance Company
submitted that there was no basis to assess the income of the deceased as Rs.
15,000/- per month as no documentary evidence were available before the learned
Tribunal in support. He thus submitted that the learned Tribunal, therefore, rightly
assessed the income of deceased. Learned counsel further submitted that in the
facts and circumstances of the case, the appellants/claimants were rightly
compensated and, thus the present appeal was liable to be dismissed.
DISCUSSION
5. I have heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the paper-
book of the case. I find force in the arguments advanced by learned Counsel for the
appellants.
2 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 06-01-2026 11:53:55 :::
##PAGE3##FAO-3207-2019 --3--
QUESTION OF INCOME ASSESSED
6. In the present case, in view of the statement of Anita Devi (son of
deceased) who appeared as PW-1, it was deposed that the deceased was earning
Rs. 15,000 per month by working as a motor mechanic, however, no documentary
evidence to support the same was placed before the Tribunal in this regard thus, the
learned Tribunal assessed the income of deceased @ Rs. 5,000/- per month. In this
situation observations made by the Hon’ble Apex Court in “Kubra Bibi vs.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.”, reported as 2023 (3) Apex Court Judgments (SC)
23, to the effect that in the absence of definite proof of income, the social status of
the deceased was to be kept in perspective where such persons were employed in
an unorganized sector and the notional income was required to be taken into
consideration to help the cause of the appellant. Relevant para from this judgment
is reproduced hereunder:-
“7. In a matter of the present nature where the compensation is
sought and ev
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.