IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

-.-

RSA-671-1991 (O&M)

Reserved on:-08.01.2026

Pronounced on:- 09.01.2026

Uploaded on:- 09.01.2026

Whether only operative part of the judgment is

Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment

Sham Lal (since deceased) through LRs ....Appellant

VERSUS

Shiv Parshad (since deceased) through LR ....Respondent

CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU

Present: Mr. Varun Baanth, Advocate for the appellant

(through Video Conferencing)

Mr. Sahil Garg, Advocate for the respondent.

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU, J.

1. The present Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the appellant– defendant (since deceased), through his legal representatives, against the concurrent findings of the Courts below. The learned Trial Court, vide judgment and decree dated 9.11.1987, decreed the suit filed by the plaintiff–respondent. The said judgment and decree were affirmed by the learned Lower Appellate Court

vide judgment and decree dated 16.11.1990.

Brief Facts

2. Briefly stated, the plaintiff filed a suit for possession by way of pre- emption under Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, in respect of a share in House No. 4291/2 (old), new No. AMC-1