SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 102

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
AMAR SINGH AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Date of decision: 08.01.2026

Jasbir Singh ...Petitioner(s)

Vs.

Amar Singh and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

Present:- Ms. Harkirat Kaur, Advocate for

Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. A.P.Kaushal, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of

Constitution of India has been filed by the plaintiff against the order dated 28.01.2019 (Annexure P-2) passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hoshiarpur; whereby evidence of the petitioner has been closed by

order.

2. It is inter alia submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the present case, material evidence has been led on the record. But there are three witnesses namely Sarpanch Hazara Ram, Lamberdar Santokh Singh and Smt. Bhupinder Kaur as well as one Darshan Singh who had signed the Will in the capacity of witnesses. But later on, during the course of evidence the aforesaid witnesses have not been putting in appearance. In the given case, aforesaid Bhupinder Kaur one of the

attesting witnesses had earlier put in appearance as PW-6 while submitting her respective evidence

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top