IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

****

Sukh Pal (Deceased) through LRs

. . . . Appellant

Vs.

Raja Ram (Deceased) through LRs and others

. . . . Respondents

****

Reserved on: 12.12.2025

Pronounced on: January 08, 2026

Pronounced Fully/Operative Part: Fully

****

CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

****

Present: - Mr. S.K. Garg Narwana, Senior Advocate, and

Mr. Adarsh Jain, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Nitin Sachdeva, Advocate and

Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate,

for the appellants.

Mr. Pankaj Nanhera, Senior Advocate, with

Mr. Nitin Verma, Advocate, and

Mr. Aman Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Varun Parkash, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

****

DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

CMs-221 & 222-C-2015

These applications were moved during pendency of the appeal,

but vide an order dated 09.12.2022 of the Coordinate Bench, the same

were ordered to be heard along with the main case.

By way of CM-221-2015, it was pointed out that during

pendency of the appeal, appellant Sukh Pal had expired; that his legal heirs were not aware about the pendency of this appeal, or any order against

alienation in the absence of any entry in the revenue record and they had executed a registered sale deed No.8975 dated 21.08.201