IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

-.-

RSA-2625-1993 (O&M) Reserved on:-22.12.2025

Pronounced on:- 08.01.2026

Uploaded on:-08.01.2026

Whether only operative part of the judgment is

Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment

Dharam Singh (since deceased) through LRs ....Appellant

VERSUS

Chajju Ram (since deceased) through LRs and Ors. ....Respondents

CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU

Present: Mr. Kartar Singh Malik, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Sr. Advocate, assisted by

Mr. Nischal Manchanda, Mr. Devyansh and

Mr. Vipul Thakur, Advocates for LRs of respondent No.1.

Service of respondents No.2 to 5 not necessary

vide order dated 04.12.2025.

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU, J.

1. Present RSA has been filed by the defendant/appellant against the concurrent findings of the Courts below, whereby the learned trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 22.07.1992 decreed the suit of the plaintiff for possession by way of pre-emption and the learned lower appellate Court vide judgment and decree dated 27.07.1993 affirmed the findings recorded by the trial

Court.

Brief Facts

2. The plaintiff filed a suit for possession by way of pre-emption. Briefly