SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8430

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NAFE SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NARESH KUMAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113+201 CR-1995-2024 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 23.12.2025

Nafe Singh

.…Petitioner

Versus

Naresh Kumar .... Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

Present: - Mr. Arman Goyal, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. B.S. Rathee, Advocate

Mr. Vijay Deep Rathee, Advocate

for the respondent.

Mr. Suraj Mandhan, Advocate

for Auction Purchaser.

****

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

CM-22927-CII-2025

Present application under Order 1 Rule 10 has been filed by

the Sandeep Kumar Auction Purchaser of the suit property for impleading

him as respondent No.2 being necessary and proper party.

It is prayed that the present application be allowed and

applicant be impleaded as party respondent No.2 being necessary and

proper party.

Heard.

The present dispute is between judgment debtor and the

decree holder with regard to the identity of the decree holder. In view of

the order passed in the main Revision Petition, present application stands dismissed. The applicant is at liberty to pursue his rights in accordance with law before the learned Executing Court.

CM-22928-CII-2025 Present application under Section 151 CPC has been filed by the proposed respondent No.2 seeking modification of or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top