IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Reserved on 27th of November, 2025

Pronounced on 23rd of December, 2025

Uploaded on 23^rd of December, 2025

Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes

CR No.3598 of 2015

Dr. S.P. Dhawan ....Petitioner

Versus

Kay Gee Finances Thr. its Proprietor and others .....Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN

Present : Mr. R. Kartikeya Iyer, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. Sarju Puri, Senior Advocate with

Ms. Anjila Guru, Advocate

for the respondents. PANKAJ JAIN, J.

Present revision petition is directed against order dated

12.03.2015 whereby order dated 31.03.2010 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandigarh dismissing the application filed by the petitioner, under Order IX Rule 13 CPC read with Order XXII Rule 4A CPC for setting aside ex parte judgment and decree dated 05.02.2002 passed in Civil Suit

No.197/06.07.1994, has been dismissed with costs.

2. The lis relates to a residential property bearing House No.1858 situated in Section 22-B, Chandigarh, which was admittedly owned by

Ramji Dass son of Jiwan Dass, predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner.

3. Respondent i.e., Kay Ge