SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8452

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARUN KUMAR GAUTAM – Appellant
Versus
RAJBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Date of decision: 23.12.2025

Arun Kumar Gautam ....Appellant

V/s

Rajbir Singh and another ....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL

Present: Mr. Aseem Aggarwal, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Avnish Mittal, Advocate and

Ms. Aparna Singhal, Advocate,

for the caveator-respondent No.1.

***

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.

Defendant is in appeal against the judgment and decree dated

03.11.2025 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, SAS Nagar, dismissing his appeal against the judgment and decree dated 08.04.2025 passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Dera Bassi, vide which the suit of the plaintiffs-respondents for possession by way of specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 02.07.2020 was decreed as per

the provisions of Order XII Rule 6 CPC.

2. For the sake of convenience and clarity, parties shall be referred

to as per their original status.

3. Plaintiffs (Rajbir Singh and Kirna Devi) instituted a suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 02.07.2020, executed by the defendant (Arun Kumar Gautam) in favour of the plaintiffs for sale of House No.41A, situated at AKS Colony, Vi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top