[109] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Reserved on 20.11.2025

Pronounced on 23.12.2025

Uploaded on 23.12.2025

Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes

Jangir Kaur and others …Appellants

versus

The State of Haryana and others ….Respondents

Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN

Present: Mr. Rajesh Nagpal, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana.

****

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

CM-13490-C-2013

[1] For the reasons recorded in the application, this Court is satisfied that the appellants have made sufficient cause for condonation of

delay of 18 days in filing of the appeal.

[2] Application stands allowed and delay of 18 days in filing of the

appeal is condoned.

RSA-5005-2013 (O&M)

[3] Plaintiffs are in second appeal.

[4] For the convenience, parties hereinafter are referred to by their original positions in the civil suit, i.e. appellants as the ‘plaintiffs’ and the

respondents as ‘defendants’.

[5] Plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration claiming that the plaintiffs are entitled for possession of land measuring 07 bighas 10 biswas as detailed out in para No.1 of the plaint.

[6] As per the case of the plai