##PAGE1##

RSA(cid:4)5211(cid:4)2015 (O&M) (cid:4)(cid:4)1(cid:4)(cid:4)

(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:4)(cid:8)(cid:5)(cid:10)(cid:8)(cid:4)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:12)(cid:15)(cid:4)(cid:16)(cid:13)(cid:6)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:4)(cid:18)(cid:6)(cid:20)(cid:4)(cid:8)(cid:18)(cid:14)(cid:21)(cid:18)(cid:6)(cid:18)(cid:4)(cid:18)(cid:7)

(cid:11)(cid:8)(cid:18)(cid:6)(cid:20)(cid:5)(cid:10)(cid:18)(cid:14)(cid:8)

RSA(cid:4)5211(cid:4)2015 (O&M)

Reserved on:(cid:4)10.11.2025

Pronounced on:(cid:4)23.12.2025

Uploaded on:(cid:4)23.12.2025

Smt. Hussaini (since deceased) thr. her LRs and others ....Appellants..

vs.

Parmina @ Janshida ....Respondent.

(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:14)(cid:18)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:4)(cid:8)(cid:12)(cid:6)(cid:24)(cid:19)ti(cid:9)(cid:4)(cid:22)(cid:14)(cid:26)(cid:4)(cid:17)(cid:13)(cid:27)(cid:7)(cid:5)(cid:11)(cid:9)(cid:4)(cid:8)(cid:18)(cid:14)(cid:28)(cid:9)(cid:27)(cid:8)(cid:4)(cid:22)(cid:18)(cid:6)(cid:13)(cid:17)(cid:18)

Present: Mr.Rajinder Goel, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate with

Mr. Himanshu Rao, Advocate for the respondent.

*****

(cid:8)(cid:18)(cid:14)(cid:28)(cid:9)(cid:27)(cid:8)(cid:4)(cid:22)(cid:18)(cid:6)(cid:13)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:4)(cid:17)(cid:26)(cid:4)(cid:29)(cid:12)(cid:30)(cid:31) !

1. By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to the judgments

and decrees dated 21.01.2015 and 28.07.2025 passed by the Courts below,

whereby, a suit for declaration as well as joint possession preferred at the instance

of respondent(cid:4)plaintiff was decreed in her favour.

2. Briefly stating, a suit for declaration and joint possession was filed at

the instance of respondent(cid:4)plaintiff (Parmeena @ Janshida), claiming herself to be

co(cid:4)owner to the extent of ½ share in respect of 34 kanals of land situated within the

revenue estate of Village Nijampur, Tehsil Tauru, District Mewat as well as ½ share

out of land measuring 57 kanals 14 marlas situated in Village Chundika, Tehsil

Tauru, District Mewat. It was alleged that one Malook Singh who happened to be

the father of plaintiff had two wives namely, Akina and Hussaini and the

respondent(cid:4)plaintiff being daughter of the pre(cid:4)deceased widow(cid:4)Akina was entitled

1 of 14

::: Downloaded on - 11-01-2026 15:38:20 :::

RSA(cid:4)5211(cid:4)2015 (O&M) (cid:4)(cid:4)2(cid:4)(cid:4)

to inherit the estate of said Malook Singh jointly with appellant No.1(cid:4)defendant

No.1. It was also alleged that Malook Singh owned land in Villages Goal and

Sherpur Jat, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar and the same was mutated in favour of

appellant no. 1 and the plaintiff in equal Shares. It was further pleaded that

appellant No.1(cid:4)defendant No.1 with the help of her brother’s son and in collusion

with revenue official by taking undue advantage of absence of respondent(cid:4)plaintiff

got entered two mutations bearing No.1332 and 997, exclusively in her favour qua

the entire suit property which were, thus, wrong and illegal. It was further pleaded

that appellant No.1(cid:4)defendant No.1 also got executed two gift deeds dated

24.02.2006 bearing vasika Nos.2595 & 2594 in favour of appellants No.2 to

6/defendants No.2 to 6, and the same were thus illegal, null and void qua the share

of plaintiff. Hence, the present suit.

3. Upon notice, the appellant(s)(cid:4)defendant(s) appeared and filed their

joint written statement taking preliminary objections regarding locus standi, proper

court fee, estoppel and maintainability of the suit. It was disputed and denied that

the respondent(cid:4)plaintiff was co(cid:4)owner to the extent of ½ share in the suit lands or

that Malook Singh purchased the land detailed in para 2 of the plaint. It was

pleaded that the entire suit land was ancestral in the hands of Malook Singh. It was

also denied that Malook Singh was governed by agricultural custom or that

according to agricu