SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8457

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(O&M)BALJINDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
E.S.I. CORPORATION – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Reserved on 27th of November, 2025

Pronounced on 23rdof December, 2025

Uploaded on 23rd of December, 2025

Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes

FAO No.937 of 1998 (O&M)

Baljinder Kaur ....Appellant

Versus

ESI Corporation and another .....Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN

Present : Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. H.S. Bhatia, Advocate for the respondents.

PANKAJ JAIN, J.

Present appeal is directed against the order dated 07.03.1998

passed by ESI Court whereby appeal preferred by the claimant under Section 75(2) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as

'the 1948 Act') has been dismissed rejecting the claim of the appellant.

2. The issue involved in the present appeal is :

“Whether deceased Gurcharan Singh, who was employed as Kitchen Runner and Dish Washer with M/s Floating Restaurant, died in an accident arising out of and during the course of

employment or not?

3. Gurcharan Singh used to commute from his residence to his place of employment by cycle covering 7 Kilometes daily. As per the claimant, on 18.10.1993 at abou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top