IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA DEVI AND OTHERS – Respondent
##PAGE1##
126
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
FAO-2179-2024 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 23.12.2025
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. .... Appellant
VERSUS
KRISHNA DEVI & ORS .... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for
Mr. Paul S. Saini, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Rajiv Kumar Saini, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4.
None for respondent No.5.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant
challenging the award dated 18.01.2024 passed by the Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal, Karnal (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’) on the limited
ground that the deceased was a Haryana Government employee and that the
dependents of the deceased were entitled to receive the amount under the
Haryana Compassionate Assistance to the Dependents of Deceased
Government Employees Rules, 2006. Though it has been noted in the
impugned award that the dependents of the deceased would be entitled to
receive an amount of ₹32,59,008/-, however, while calculating the
compensation to be awarded to the dependents, only 50% of the said amount
i.e. ₹16,29,504 has been deducted from the compensation awarded.
1 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 11-01-2026 15:51:13 :::
##PAGE2##FAO-2179-2024 (O&M) -2-
2. The Tribunal in the present case had awarded the following
compensation :
Sr. No. Heads Compensation Awarded
1. Monthly income ₹23,838
2. Future prospects 25% [₹23,838 + ₹5,960] = ₹29,798
3. Deduction 1/4th [₹29,798 - ₹7,450] = ₹22,348
4. Annual income [₹22,348 x 12] = ₹2,68,176
5. Multiplier of 13 [₹2,68,176 x 13] = ₹34,86,288
6. Funeral expenses ₹15,000
7. Loss of estate ₹15,000
8. Loss of consortium for widow ₹40,000
9. Expenses incurred on the ₹1,99,900
treatment of victim/deceased
Total Compensation ₹37,56,188
Amount to be deducted ₹16,29,504
(received by respondents No.1
to 4 under Haryana
Compassionate Assistance to
the Dependents of Deceased
Government Employees Rules,
2006)
Compensation after ₹21,26,684
deduction
Interest @ 9% p.a.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant would contend that as per the
judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the cases of Reliance General
Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Shashi Sharma & Ors. [2016(4) RCR (Civil) 569]
and Krishna & Ors. vs. Tek Chand & Ors. [2024 ACJ 443] the entire
amount received under the Haryana Compassionate Assistance to the
Dependents of Deceased Government Employees Rules, 2006 has to be
deducted while calculating the compensation payable to the respondents No.1
to 4 herein.
2 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 11-01-2026 15:51:14 :::
##PAGE3##FAO-2179-2024 (O&M) -3-
4. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 4 does not dispute the
aforesaid fact. Learned counsel, however, states that the amounts awarded
under the conventional heads as well as under the head loss of consortium are
not in consonance with the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in
the cases of National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors.
[(2017) 16 SCC 680], Magma General Insurance Company Limited vs.
Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram & Ors. [(2018) 18 SCC 130] and N.
Jayasree & Ors. vs. Cholamandalam M.S General Insurance Company
Ltd. [2021(4) RCR (Civil) 642]
5. Heard.
6. The argument of the learned counsel for the appellant that the
entire amount received by respondents No.1 to 4 under the Haryana
Compassionate Assistance to the Dependents of Deceased Government
Employees Rules, 2006 ought to be deducted, deserves to be accepted. The
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Shashi Sharma (supra) has held as
under :
‘19. Reverting back to Rule 5, sub-clause (1) provides
for the period during which the dependents of the deceased
employee may receive financial assistance equivalent to
the pay and other allowances that was last drawn by the
deceased employee in the normal course without raising a
specific claim. Sub-rule (2) provides that the family shall
be eligible to receive family pension as per the normal
Rules only after the period during which they would
3 of 7
::: Downloaded on - 11-01-2026 15:51:14 :::
##PAGE4##FAO-2179-20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.