SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8491

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJIV AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Date of Decision: December 23, 2025

RAJIV AND ORS ........Appellants

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS .....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present: Mr. S.P. Tyagi, Advocate,

Mr. Anil Dutt, Advocate and

Mr. Rajender Chhokar, Advocate for the appellant(s).

Mr. Anand Singh, Advocate for the appellants

in RFA Nos.1007/2014, 4029 and 4030 of 2013. Mr. Ram Pal Verma, Advocate for the appellants

in RFA Nos.4034 and 4035 of 2013. Mr. Abhishek Yadav, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate and

Mr. Daanish Mahajan, Advocate for respondent No.3.

****

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

CM-1062-CI-2020

Present application is for seeking permission to produce and

prove the documents i.e. Exs. A-1 to A-8 as additional evidence.

Notice of the application was issued to respondents (HAFED)

and reply to the same stands filed.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone

through the contents of the application. Considering the authenticity and genuineness of documents which mainly form part of official records and the veracity thereof, having not been assailed by the respondents, the

prayer made in the application is allowed and documents i.e.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top