IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

-.-

CR-9438-2025 (O&M)

Decided on :-22.12.2025

Surinder Singh ....Petitioner

VERSUS

Lalit Saroch ....Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU

Present: Mr. Yajur Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU J.

1. The present civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for setting aside the order dated 01.11.2025 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dasuya, whereby the application filed by the respondent–landlord under Order VI Rule 17 read with

Section 151 CPC for amendment of the petition and site plan has been allowed.

2. The petitioner assails the impugned order primarily on the ground that the amendment permitted by the Trial Court amounts to a substantive change in the pleadings, withdraws earlier admissions, and materially prejudices the defence of the tenant. Reliance has been placed upon various judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, including Vidyabai v. Padmalatha (2009) 2 SCC 409, Modi Spinning & Weaving Mills v. Ladha Ram (1977) 1 SCC 728, Revajeetu Builders & Developers v. Narayanaswamy (2009) 10 SCC 84 and allied precedents, to contend tha