120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

RSA-4194-2017 (O&M) Reserved on 30.10.2025

Pronounced on : 22.12.2025

Uploaded on : 22.12.2025

Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes

Kalawati ….Appellant

Versus

State of Haryana & ors. ….Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN

*****

Present:- Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocate

for the appellant. (Through V.C.).

Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, Asstt. A.G., Haryana.

*****

PANKAJ JAIN, J.

1 Plaintiff is in second appeal. For convenience, parties hereinafter are referred to by their original position in the suit, i.e. the appellant as plaintiff

and respondents as defendants.

2 Plaintiff filed suit seeking declaration to the effect that she is entitled to get the financial assistance equivalent to salary last drawn till the date of superannuation of her deceased son Shri Hari Har Mohan and sought mandate to the defendants to release the benefits in terms of the Haryana

Compassionate Assistance to the dependents of the deceased Government Employees Rules, 2006 (for short, ‘the 2006 Rules’) along with interest.

3 As per the case of the plaintiff, her son namely Hari Har Mohan was working as