IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

-.-

RSA-4255-1999 (O&M) Reserved on:-09.12.2025

Pronounced on:- 22.12.2025

Uploaded on:-22.12.2025

Whether only operative part of the judgment is

Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment Surinder Singh (since deceased) through LRs ....Appellant

VERSUS

Ujagar Singh (since deceased) through LRs and Others ....Respondents

CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU

Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Aeshna Jain, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. J.S.Bhandohal, Advocate

for LRs of respondent No.1.

Service of respondents No.2 to 7 dispensed with

vide order dated 22.12.1999

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU, J.

1. The present Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the appellant– defendant against the judgment and decree dated 09.10.1999 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar, whereby the appeal preferred by the plaintiff was allowed and the judgment and decree dated 26.08.1994 passed by the learned

Sub Judge, Rupnagar, dismissing the suit of the plaintiff, were set aside.

Brief Facts

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that Chamela Singh was the owner of the suit land. The plaintiff Ujagar Singh and