SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8528

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIDYA RATTAN AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
MAHENDER KUMAR AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

209 RSA-681-2008(O&M)

Date of decision: 22.12.2025

Vidya Rattan & Another

...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Mahender Kumar & Others

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

Present:- Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Senior Advocate with

Mr. Shrey Sachdeva, Advocate

Ms. Shruti Singla, Advocate

for the appellants.

Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate

Mr. Jatin Sehra, Advocate

for respondents No.2(iii) and (iv).

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

The plaintiffs are in Second Appeal against the concurrent

judgments and decrees of the learned Courts below whereby suit filed by the appellants for possession by way of redemption, has been dismissed by both

the Courts below.

2. The case, as pleaded by the appellants in the plaint was that Puran Chand, Girdhari Lal, Ishwar Dayal (father of the plaintiffs), and Ugar Sain were all owners in possession of the shop in dispute. All the aforesaid owners had executed a registered Mortgage Deed dated 11.11.1971 mortgaging suit shop with possession to Karam Chand/defendant No.3 for a

sum of Rs.2,000/-. Thereafter, defendant No.3 inducted defendant No.2/Ram Chander as his tenant vide Rent Note dated 8.12.1971 for the period upto 07.03.1972. Subsequently,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top