IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

147+266

CRR-707-2025 (O&M)

4Date of decision: 22.12.2025

Raj Kamal ...Petitioner

Versus

M/s Darshan Lal and another ...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA

Present:- Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate

for the applicant-petitioner.

Mr. Sunil Doda, Advocate

for respondent No.1/complainant. Mr. Durgesh Garg, AAG, Punjab.

MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)

1. CRM-47904-2025

Prayer in this application is for compounding the offence in

view of the fact that the parties have amicably settled their dispute.

Since the prayer made in this application has direct bearing on

the main revision petition, the application is disposed of and let the main

case, which is also listed today, be taken up.

2. CRR-707-2025 (O&M)

The present revision petition has been filed against the

judgment of conviction and order on quantum of sentence, both dated 28.02.2017, passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Abohar in complaint bearing No. 1152-2 of 2013, titled as M/s Darshan Lal

Chetan Kumar Commission Agents vs. Raj Kamal, filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘N. I. Act’), whereby the petitioner was he