SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8541

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SITA RAM – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Decided on:22.12.2025

Amar Singh Yadav and another …Appellants

Versus

Sita Ram and others …Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL

Present: Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate

for the appellants.

None for respondents No.1 and 2.

Mr. Satpal Dhamija, Advocate

for respondent No.3-insurance company.

****

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)

1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants–claimants seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Hisar (hereinafter “the Tribunal”), vide award dated 22.04.2000, whereby a sum of ₹1,22,000/- was granted on account of the death of Shiv Kumar, son of

the appellants.

2. Succinctly, facts of the case are that on 31.05.1998, Prem Singh (since deceased) along with Shiv Kumar (since deceased) were travelling from Gangwa to Adampur on a Hero Honda motorcycle bearing registration No.HR-20B-469. Shiv Kumar was driving the motorcycle, whereas Prem Singh was a pillion rider. They were being followed by their uncle Karan Singh on a separate motorcycle. At about 10:00 A.M., when they reached near Balsmand Branch Canal, a buffalo suddenly appeared on t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top