SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8580

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
JASWANT LAL – Respondent


145 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

VS

JASWANT LAL

Present: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate

for the review applicants/appellants.

**

1. The present review application is filed for reviewing judgment dated 11.11.2025 passed by this Court in Regular Second Appeal No.3878 of

2013.

2. Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants contends that the contentions of the applicants/appellant regarding non-entitlement of stagnation have been recorded by this Court but no finding has been returned on the same. Further, Food Corporation of India is not liable to pay the pension as per the provisions of Employees’ Pension Scheme. He relies upon judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Girdhari Lal Gupta,

Vs. D.N. Mehta and another, 1971(3) SCC 189 to support his contention.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the applicants/appellants.

4. A perusal of the judgment dated 11.11.2025 passed by this Court shows that all the contentions of the parties as such are recorded and judgment and decree dated 07.04.2012 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Patiala, and judgment and decree dated 10.04.2013 passed by learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Patiala, are upheld as per issues

framed in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top