IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NIHAL SINGH AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
RAJ MOHAN SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent
##PAGE1##
1 of 5
::: Downloaded on - 12-01-2026 09:14:45 :::
##PAGE2##CM-1896-CI-2020 in/and 2025:PHHC:176828
RFA No.1800 of 2019 (O&M) and
CM-1325-CI-2022 in/and XOBJR No.23 of 2020
13.01.2010 under Sec(cid:14)on 4 of the Land Acquisi(cid:14)on Act, 1894 (for short, “the
L.A. Act”), followed by No(cid:14)fica(cid:14)on dated 25.01.2010 under Sec(cid:14)on 6, for
public purpose, namely development and u(cid:14)liza(cid:14)on of Sector Roads and Sec-
tors 99 to 115, Gurugram. The Land Acquisi(cid:14)on Collector, vide Award No.83
dated 31.03.2010, assessed the market value of the acquired land at
₹43,00,000/- per acre. Dissa(cid:14)sfied landowners sought references under Sec-
(cid:14)on 18 of the L.A. Act. The Reference Court, in a lead case bearing LAC
No.801 of 2011 (cid:14)tled “Bahadur v. State of Haryana”, decided on 15.03.2014,
enhanced the market value to ₹1,51,75,416/- per acre, besides statutory
benefits.
4. CASE OF THE PARTIES : The present appeal relates to 2/7 share
of land comprised in Rectangle No.52, Killa No.5 (8-0), Khewat No.22, Khata
No.27, village Gopalpur, Gurugram. Ini(cid:14)ally, compensa(cid:14)on in respect of the
said land was released by the Land Acquisi(cid:14)on Collector in favour of Raj
Mohan Singh (respondent No.1 / cross-objector).
5. Appellants Nihal Singh and Hoshiar Singh sought reference un-
der Sec(cid:14)ons 18 and 30 of the L.A. Act, asser(cid:14)ng that they had purchased the
land from Raj Mohan Singh vide registered sale deed dated 07.01.1975, fol-
lowed by Muta(cid:14)on No.601 dated 23.02.1980 (Ex.P-1). It was pleaded that the
muta(cid:14)on was not reflected in subsequent revenue records, resul(cid:14)ng in erro-
neous disbursement of compensa(cid:14)on to respondent No.1. The appellants,
therefore, claimed both (cid:14)tle to compensa(cid:14)on as well as enhancement of
market value.
6. Despite service, respondent No.1 did not appear before the Ref-
erence Court and was proceeded against ex parte. Upon appraisal of docu-
mentary and oral evidence, the Reference Court held the appellants to be the
righCul owners of the acquired land and en(cid:14)tled to compensa(cid:14)on. The mar-
ket value was assessed at ₹1,51,75,416/- per acre, in line with earlier awards.
Consequently, Award dated 29.11.2018 was passed.
Page 2 of 5
2 of 5
::: Downloaded on - 12-01-2026 09:14:46 :::
##PAGE3##CM-1896-CI-2020 in/and 2025:PHHC:176828
RFA No.1800 of 2019 (O&M) and
CM-1325-CI-2022 in/and XOBJR No.23 of 2020
7. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THIS COURT : Aggrieved by non-grant of
further enhancement, the appellants filed the present RFA No.1800 of 2019.
Respondent No.1 filed Cross Objec(cid:14)ons No.XOBJR-23 of 2020, seeking seIng
aside of the ex parte proceedings and remand of the maJer, while asser(cid:14)ng
exclusive en(cid:14)tlement to compensa(cid:14)on.
8. Notably, no one appeared on behalf of respondent No.1 / cross-
objector at the (cid:14)me of final hearing, despite specific in(cid:14)ma(cid:14)on having been
sent to his counsel.
9. This Court has heard the arguments advanced by learned coun-
sel for the appellants and learned State counsel, and has perused the record
with their assistance.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
10. (A) En(cid:7)tlement to Compensa(cid:7)on : The Reference Court, on the
basis of cogent evidence, recorded a categorical finding that Raj Mohan Singh
had sold the disputed land to the appellants vide registered sale deed dated
07.01.1975, which was duly followed by Muta(cid:31)on No.601 dated 23.02.1980
(Ex.P-1). Consequently, the appellants became owners in possession of the
acquired land, including the 2/7 share forming the subject maJer of the
present proceedings. The Reference Court further no(cid:14)ced that the Collector
issued a le-er dated 28.01.2013 (Mark-B) to respondent No.1, calling upon
him to refund the compensa(cid:31)on amount wrongly received by him. The
amount was eventually deposited and thereaKer disbursed to the appellants
on 28.09.2018 through RTGS.
11. Addi(cid:14)onally, reliance placed by learned counsel for the appel-
la
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.