IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

-.-

CR-4044-2002 (O&M)

Reserved on:-09.12.2025

Pronounced on : 19.12.2025

Uploaded on:- 19.12.2025

Whether only operative part of the judgment is

Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment

Nyamat Masih ....Petitioner

VERSUS

Gram Panchayat Dadwan, District Gurdaspur ....Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU

Present: Mr. APS Shergil, Advocate and

Mr. Simranjot Singh Nagra, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Sr. Advocate assisted by

Ms. Tejinder Kaur, Advocate for the respondent.

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU J.

1. The present civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioner– defendant challenging the order dated 31.05.2000 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gurdaspur, whereby the application filed by the respondent–Gram Panchayat under Order XXI Rule 32 read with Section 151 CPC was allowed and warrants of attachment of the property of the petitioner were ordered to be issued for alleged violation of a statement made by him in the court

on 26.07.1996.

2. The facts, in brief, as borne out from the impugned order and the record, are that the respondent–Gram Panchayat had earlier i