IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Date of Decision: 19.12.2025

Meena and others ....Petitioners

VERSUS

Raj Kapoor and others ...Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL

Present: Mr. Arihant Goyal, Advocate, with

Mr. Saurav Saini, Advocate, &

Ms. Lovedeep Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners.

***

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ,J. (ORAL)

1. The present revision has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 16.10.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division)-cum CJM, Rohtak passed in Civil Suit No.566/2018 titled as “Smt. Meena and Others Vs. Raj Kapoor and Others”, whereby learned trial Court has dismissed the

application for additional evidence.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction seeking cancellation of Sale Deed No.1887 dated 11.05.2018. Along with the civil suit, the petitioners also filed an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC. The suit was contested by the respondents by filing their written statement. Thereafter, issues were framed and the parties led their respective

evidenc