IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CR-9609-2025

DECIDED ON: 19.12.2025

ARUN KUMAR

.....PETITIONER

VERSUS

KULDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER

.....RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU

Present: Mr. Mohit Rana, Advocate

for the petitioner.

MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL)

1. The present civil revision petition has been filed by the third- party objector assailing the order dated 01.12.2025 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rupnagar, whereby the objections filed by the petitioner under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC were dismissed and warrants of possession were directed to be issued in favour of the decree

holder.

2. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that the Executing Court acted without jurisdiction in dismissing the third-party

objections is wholly misconceived.

3. At the outset, this Court is of the considered view that no notice is required to be issued to the respondents, as the revision petition raises only a short and purely legal question arising from execution proceedings,

and the record placed before this Court is sufficient for effective adjudication.

4. A perusal of the record shows that the decree in question arises out of a suit for s