SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8595

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
M/S BALAJI ELECT. WELD PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
M/S VIJAY WIRE DRIVING AND STEEL INDUSTRY – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CR-9622-2025

DECIDED ON: 19.12.2025

M/S BALAJI ELECTRO WELD PVT. LTD.

.....PETITIONER

VERSUS

M/S VIJAY WIRE DRIVING AND STEEL INDUSTRY

.....RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU

Present: Mr. Ajay Vijarania, Advocate

for the petitioner.

MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL)

1. The present civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed assailing the order dated 24.11.2025 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Charkhi Dadri, whereby the application moved by the petitioner–defendant for staying the execution proceedings arising out of the ex-parte judgment and decree dated 31.05.2023 during the pendency of the application under Order

IX Rule 13 CPC has been declined.

2. The brief background of the case is that the respondent instituted a civil suit which culminated in an ex-parte judgment and decree dated 31.05.2023. Subsequent thereto, execution proceedings were initiated. The petitioner, upon acquiring knowledge of the decree, moved an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC for setting aside the ex-parte judgment and decree and, simultaneously, sought stay of execution proceedings

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top