SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8622

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
M/S JAI BALA JI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

109+203

ARB-225-2021 (O&M)

Date of Decision:19.12.2025

M/s Jai Bala Ji Construction Company

......Petitioner

Versus

Union of India and another

......Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI

Present:- Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate and

Mr. J.S. Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Arvind Seth, Senior Panel Counsel for respondents.

*****

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI J.(Oral)

CM-24598-CII-2025

1. On the last date of hearing, notice in the application was issued and Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate, had appeared and sought time to

file a reply.

2. Today, learned counsel for the respondents has stated that he

has no objection in case the present application is allowed.

3. In view of the above, the present application is allowed,

subject to all just exceptions.

4. The accompanying documents are taken on record as

Annexures P-6 to P-8.

Main case

5. The present is a petition filed under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’),

seeking appointment of an independent Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate upon the disputes which have arisen between the parties.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top