232

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CM-7526-C-2001 in/and

RSA-3788-2001

Reserved on : 09.12.2025

Pronounced on : 18.12.2025

Uploaded on : 18.12.2025

JAGDEEP KAUR ...Appellant

Vs.

JOGINDER SINGH ...Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Present: Mr. N.S. Thind, Advocate

for the appellant.

None for the respondent.

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J.

1. The present suit was instituted on the allegation that the appellant/defendant borrowed a sum of Rs. 75,000/- from the respondent/plaintiff on 10.11.1993. It was averred that the appellant/defendant had agreed to repay the principal amount along with interest at the rate of 2% per annum and, in furtherance of the transaction, executed a promissory note (pronote) and a receipt in favour of the respondent/plaintiff. Subsequently, upon demand for repayment, the appellant/defendant failed to discharge her liability. Despite service of a legal notice demanding payment, no response or repayment was made. Consequently, the respondent/plaintiff instituted the suit seeking recovery of

the loan amount along with interest, asserting that the pronote and receipt constitute valid and enforceable instruments evidencing the debt.

2. On noti